Skip to main content
University
of
Nebraska–Lincoln
Log In
Search
Search
Submit
Close
Midwest Roadside Safety Facility
Menu
Search
Log In
Home
Who We Are
History
Faculty/Staff
Employment
Contact Us
Services
Testing
Finite Element Analysis
Design/Consulting
Pooled Fund
About
Member States
Active Projects
Members Only
Tech Transfer
Newsletters and Featured Research
Research Hub
AFB20 (user/password required)
Pooled Fund Q&A
Q&A Home
Ask a Question
Search Questions
Q&A Reports
Login
Q&A Home
Ask Us A Question
Search Answered Questions
Q&A Reports
Login
Nebraska
MwRSF
Q&A Home
Seach Q&A
View Q&A
View Q&A
MGS Box Culvert Mounting
Question
State
NE
Description Text
Implementation of MGS mounted to culvert parapet.
I need to shorten the top mount.
The NDOR typical parapet is only 8” wide.
There should be more concrete behind this threaded rod from the top.
What should the strap length be?
Should the cover over the threaded rod be 2”? or centered in the parapet
System Performance Evaluation
System Types
Road Closure Gates
Thrie Beam Guardrails
Applications
System Features
Date
October 24, 2014
Previous Views (122) Favorites (0)
Response
Response
(active)
For the culverts in which the headwall is narrow (yours are 8”), I would not utilize the top-mounted, single-anchor design to attach the socket to the outside of the headwall. For that design, it’s important to maintain the 7” anchor offset from the outside face to prevent concrete damage. Unfortunately, that will not leave you enough concrete cover on the inside of the anchor, 2 inches is recommended. We never designed the top mounted attachments for offsets less than 7”.
However, you could utilize either the wrap-around design, or the side-mounted design (through bolt). See pages 36-41 of the report (TRP-03-277-14) for the design details of these attachment options. The only difference you would need to make is the length of the strap or bolts to reflect the correct headwall width.
Note, although only 2 of the 5 design concepts were included in the final drawing details, MwRSF has confidence that all five of the concepts provide adequate strength to support the system. Thus, any of the five concepts can be utilized to satisfy the installation needs of existing culverts.
Date
December 9, 2014
Previous Views (122) Favorites (0)
Some parts of this site work best with JavaScript enabled.