Skip to main content
University
of
Nebraska–Lincoln
Log In
Search
Search
Submit
Close
Midwest Roadside Safety Facility
Menu
Search
Log In
Home
Who We Are
History
Faculty/Staff
Employment
Contact Us
Services
Testing
Finite Element Analysis
Design/Consulting
Pooled Fund
About
Member States
Active Projects
Members Only
Tech Transfer
Newsletters and Featured Research
Research Hub
AFB20 (user/password required)
Pooled Fund Q&A
Q&A Home
Ask a Question
Search Questions
Q&A Reports
Login
Q&A Home
Ask Us A Question
Search Answered Questions
Q&A Reports
Login
Nebraska
MwRSF
Q&A Home
Seach Q&A
View Q&A
View Q&A
Fence Mounted on Concrete Barrier
Question
State
IN
Description Text
Has there been any high speed testing of chainlink fence
attached to F-shape railing? We’ve got a railroad that’s mandating a 7ft+
fence on top of a 32” F-shaped rail…on the interstate. Typically we only
consider fence where there is significant pedestrian activity. The use on
an interstate structure seems like a bad idea, so I’m looking for documentation
to allay my fears
or
to use as supporting documentation to push back.
System Performance Evaluation
System Types
Bridge Rails
Permanent Concrete Barriers
Applications
System Features
Date
March 14, 2019
Previous Views (356) Favorites (0)
Attachment
Fence Mounted on a Barrier.pdf
Attachment
link.php
Response
Response
(active)
We are aware of the need for crash-worthy debris fences, particularly for railroad shielding applications.
Limited crash testing exists regarding debris fences attached to concrete parapets. As such, the significance of the structural strength of the debris fence and its offset from the front face of the barrier are largely unknown.
Debris fences attached to bridge rails are subject to two major concerns. If the debris fence is located within the Zone of Intrusion (ZOI), which is the area behind the traffic-side face of the barrier into which a vehicle may protrude during impact, it must not produce excessive occupant compartment deformations, vehicle snag, nor occupant risk due to stiff beam and post members. However, in contrast, the fences must be strong enough to withstand live and dead loads from the bridge, and should not fall onto railroad tracks below when impacted.
Additionally, there is concern that vehicle impacts involving the debris fence, especially impacts with heavy truck vehicles analogous to MASH TL-4 or higher, may have the potential to disengage components or sections of existing fence designs.
TTI researchers successfully crash tested a chain link fence attached to a New Jersey safety shape concrete barrier which was intended as a vandalism deterrent. However, this design is similar to a debris protection fence. The chain link fence was attached to the back side of the 32-in. tall, New Jersey shape concrete barrier using two U-shaped brackets with threaded rods epoxied into the concrete and nutted to the U-brackets. TTI’s test no. 472070-6 was conducted according to AASHTO’s Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings PL-2 test specification, consisting of a 5,397-lb Ford F250 pickup truck impacting at 62.8 mph and 20.2 degrees. This system is shown in Figure 2. The vehicle’s right-front A-pillar and the upper right sill of the right-side window contacted the chain link fence and middle structural bar, but the high stiffness of the truck frame and the 20-degree impact angle limited vehicle extension over the top of the barrier. To date, no debris fence designs mounted on concrete parapets have been tested to TL-3 according to MASH.
Many state DOTs have developed standardized designs for pedestrian rails or debris fences for installation in conjunction with bridge rails. Although most, if not all, of the designs have not been full-scale crash tested according to MASH TL-3 impact conditions, many of the designs were based on historically-successful systems tested under NCHRP Report No. 350, AASHTO’s Guide Specifications for Bridge Railings, or NCHRP Report No. 230.
MwRSF currently has a funded project with Iowa DOT to develop a MASH TL-3 debris fence design. The project is currently in the design phase. Feel free to contact Bob Bielenberg for more information.
Thanks
Date
March 15, 2019
Previous Views (356) Favorites (0)
Some parts of this site work best with JavaScript enabled.