Since we do not have any standards in the above area outside the needed 2' of soil support behind the guardrail posts, I am trying to establish the best practices for Metro District for guardrail posts adjacent to various slopes.
Sometimes due to the site limitations, we cannot provide the 2' of soil support behind the posts therefore, we need to establish a consistent approach to this issue for the District staff. Andy Halversen came up with the below draft guideline for use in standard soil:
For slopes 1:6 or flatter use 6' posts with 6'-3" post spacing
For slopes steeper than 1:6 to 1:3 use 7' posts with 6'-3" post spacing
For slopes steeper than 1:3 - with posts 1' from shoulder PI use 7' posts with 6'-3" post spacing
For slopes steeper than 1:3 - with posts at the shoulder PI use 7' posts with 3'-1.5" post spacing
Do you agree with the above?
How should we change the above if we have weak soil?
Your input is greatly appreciated.
We would recommend the following guidelines.
For standard W-beam guardrail:
For MGS guardrail:
However, recent research has indicated that more aggressive installation guidelines for MGS exist. First, there are options for 6-ft, 7-ft, and 9-ft long posts used in conjunction with MGS at the slope break point (SBP) of a 2:1 ditch. These resources may be useful to update your post length requirements.
https://mwrsf.unl.edu/reportResult.php?reportId=57
With regards to adjusting the installations for weak soil, we do not recommend adjusting guardrail installations for weak soil types.
Some parts of this site work best with JavaScript enabled.