Like most states, Missouri has been faced with an increasing need to tie down barriers on Portland cement concrete pavement (PCCP) that has been overlain with hot mix asphalt (HMA) pavement. The MwRSF has developed methods to tie to PCCP, or HMA on base, but a solution to the composite pavement still eludes the industry.
An upcoming project in the St. Louis area will require that freeway traffic on an 8-lane freeway to be run head to head (separated by Type F concrete barrier) in 6 of the lanes. This particular segment of highway has a 3-3/4 in. overlay of HMA.
Questions:
1. Would it be a reasonable variance of the tested and approved tie-down strap method to remove the asphalt pavement at each joint and pin directly to concrete by way of an elongated strap? (see attached diagram)
2. If this is a possibility, what would be considered a practical limit as to the thickness of asphalt layer for which this anchorage would be feasible?
3. A similar proposal involves milling a 2 ft. wide trench the entire length of the barrier run and pinning directly to the concrete by way of the conventional length strap. Would the Type F barrier still be functional if its effective height is decreased by 3-3/4 in.?
Thank you for the prompt reply to my inquiry. I have shared your analysis with the project team and have the following questions by way of follow up.
Increasing the strap thickness is not a viable option. During the development of the strap tie-down, we investigated various strap thicknesses. It was observed that thicker straps tended to pry the anchors out of the concrete with very little energy absorption and made the system less effective.
Some parts of this site work best with JavaScript enabled.