We do believe that the combination rail offset plays a role in the performance of the bridge rail tested in TRP-03-74-98. Reduction of that offset may adversely affect the performance of the barrier due to increased interaction with the combination rail as you noted below. While the reduced offset may potentially work, we cannot recommend it without further research and/or testing. You can see in the attached report that vehicle interaction with the combination rail can be a significant issue in these tests of a different combination rail that used a single-slope barrier and slightly less offset.
https://mwrsf.unl.edu/researchhub/files/Report136/TRP-03-162-07.pdf
We have discussed placement of the combination rail on a 36” single slope with MnDOT. However, that modification was believed to reduce interaction with the combination railing.
https://mwrsf-qa.unl.edu/view.php?id=1141
We did note in the report that the spindle bars could be modified to reduce disengagement of the spindles. We have not seen those recommendations implemented to the best of my knowledge. MnDOT may have more thoughts on that.
Elimination of the spindles is a potential option. As you noted, they are not structural. They are required to meet pedestrian rail criteria for rail openings.
Thanks
Some parts of this site work best with JavaScript enabled.