From: Nick.Artimovich@dot.gov [mailto:Nick.Artimovich@dot.gov] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 12:25 PM To: Daniel.Smith@modot.mo.gov Cc: Ken.Wood@dot.gov; marc.thornsberry@dot.gov; Julie.Stotlemeyer@modot.mo.gov; Rob.Frese@modot.mo.gov; James.Connell@modot.mo.gov Subject: RE: Ballasting Questions for the FHWA/DOT Midwest Work Zone Roundtable
Mr. Smith,
Thank you for your inquiry. I will defer to the researchers at Midwest Roadside Safety Facility on this question. They have conducted numerous tests on portable sign stands and would be a better source for information. If their extensive crash testing experience leads them to the opinion that your requested options would not seriously compromise the crash-worthiness of these devices under NCHRP Report 350 then I would concur with their assessment.
While I have reviewed numerous crash test reports of portable sign stands I have not kept a record of which used ballast, nor the performance of the ballast upon impact.
You may find contact information for the MWRSF on our website listing all accredited laboratories: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/policy_guide/road_hardware/laboratories/
Regards,
Nicholas A. Artimovich, II
Highway Engineer, Safety Design Team
Office of Safety Technologies, Rm E71-322
Federal Highway Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Phone 202-366-1331
Email nick.artimovich@dot.gov
WebSite http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov
From: Dan Smith [mailto:Daniel.Smith@modot.mo.gov] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 1:39 PM To: Artimovich, Nick (FHWA) Cc: Wood, Ken (FHWA); Thornsberry, Marc; Julie Stotlemeyer; Rob Frese; JAMES D CONNELL Subject: Ballasting Questions for the FHWA/DOT Midwest Work Zone Roundtable
Mr. Artimovich: MoDOT has been working on several ballasting ideas as possible alternatives to sandbags. In May, I presented the ballasting ideas to the FHWA/DOT Midwest Work Zone Roundtable and they were interested in the different ballasts and field applications. As a consensus, the roundtable would like your our opinion if they would be acceptable alternatives or would need crash testing. The description and examples are located in the attached word document.
If you have any questions please let me know. Thank you for your time.
Daniel J. Smith, P.E.
Traffic Management and Operations Engineer
MoDOT – Traffic Division
830 MoDOT Drive P.O. Box 270
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Office: (573) 526-4329
Daniel.Smith@modot.mo.gov
We have briefly reviewed the material contained in the recent inquiry. In general, if the ballast is not positioned higher than the originally configured sandbags/ballast and does not provide a potentially hazardous condition (based on size, material selection, attachment to base/legs, etc.), then alternative ballast options would likely allow the work-zone device to perform similarly and in a safe manner. If sand ballast bags or sacks are fabricated using a stronger material and protrude farther above the base and legs than original tested and evaluated, then I could envision a condition where small car vehicles encountered increased instabilities after traversing across the system.
http://mwrsf-qa.unl.edu/view.php?id=641
Some parts of this site work best with JavaScript enabled.