Skip to main content
University
of
Nebraska–Lincoln
Log In
Search
Search
Submit
Close
Midwest Roadside Safety Facility
Menu
Search
Log In
Home
Who We Are
History
Faculty/Staff
Employment
Contact Us
Services
Testing
Finite Element Analysis
Design/Consulting
Pooled Fund
About
Member States
Active Projects
Members Only
Tech Transfer
Newsletters and Featured Research
Research Hub
AFB20 (user/password required)
Pooled Fund Q&A
Q&A Home
Ask a Question
Search Questions
Q&A Reports
Login
Q&A Home
Ask Us A Question
Search Answered Questions
Q&A Reports
Login
Nebraska
MwRSF
Q&A Home
Seach Q&A
View Q&A
View Q&A
Driving Posts Through MSE Wall Reinforcement
Question
State
WY
Description Text
Following up on a previous question to the pooled fund regarding AASHTO LRFD requirements for guardrail posts placed in MSE walls dated February 13, 2014. The response referenced report TRP-03-235-11, “Development of an Economical Guardrail System for use on Wire-Faced MSE Walls”. The response also mentioned that the posts should be installed in accordance with AASHTO LRFD 11.10.10.4. In this section, it discussed penetrations through the reinforcement and recommended steel boxes be fabricated around “leave-outs” in the mesh, tying them to the mesh to provide continuity of the reinforcement. This creates many problems including trying to accurately locate these “leave-outs” when installing the posts and it could be very expensive. I am wondering if it is O.K. to drive the posts through the mesh and any material separation fabric. This would create the smallest possible penetration area through the mesh. This would likely only penetrate one to two layers of mesh located at the top of the wall where the lateral soil forces are fairly low anyway. A concern that has been raised is if this could pull the mesh out of position when the posts are driven through it. I noticed in the MwRSF report on gabions (marked “Draft”), it shows that the steel guardrail posts were driven through the wire reinforcement mesh and the material separation fabric. There was not discussion about this however. Did MwRSF experience any problems with this installation? Is this an acceptable way to install the posts by just driving them through the mesh and fabric? We have had our field personnel asking about installing sonotubes and neatly cutting the reinforcement around the tubes. I think this is a bad idea since it would introduce larger “leave-outs” in the mesh and confine soil around the posts making them overly stiff.
System Performance Evaluation
System Types
Applications
System Features
Date
April 2, 2014
Previous Views (157) Favorites (0)
Attachment
Q-Driving Post Thru MSE Reinforcement.docx
Response
Response
(active)
During the installation (and repair) of the MGS system placed on top of an MSE wall, MwRSF installed the steel posts utilizing a post driver. This most like led to the post tearing through small areas of the top layer of wire-mesh of the MSE wall. Throughout the installation of the system, repairs to the system, and 2 full-scale crash tests, no movement was observed from the MSE wall. Thus, driving the posts through the wire mesh did not appear to have any negative effects. However, please note that this was for steel posts only. As noted in a follow-up report (TRP-03-256-12), further evaluation would be necessary for recommendations concerning driving wood posts through the wire mesh due to the larger cross section area, softer material, and difficulties with removal of damaged/fractured posts. Additionally, without further study, MwRSF would not recommend the use of sonotubes as this will affect a larger area of the MSE wall's wire mesh.
Date
April 11, 2014
Previous Views (157) Favorites (0)
Some parts of this site work best with JavaScript enabled.