Skip to main content
University
of
Nebraska–Lincoln
Log In
Search
Search
Submit
Close
Midwest Roadside Safety Facility
Menu
Search
Log In
Home
Who We Are
History
Faculty/Staff
Employment
Contact Us
Services
Testing
Finite Element Analysis
Design/Consulting
Pooled Fund
About
Member States
Active Projects
Members Only
Tech Transfer
Newsletters and Featured Research
Research Hub
AFB20 (user/password required)
Pooled Fund Q&A
Q&A Home
Ask a Question
Search Questions
Q&A Reports
Login
Q&A Home
Ask Us A Question
Search Answered Questions
Q&A Reports
Login
Nebraska
MwRSF
Q&A Home
Seach Q&A
View Q&A
View Q&A
Concrete tapered end section
Question
State
KS
Description Text
We use a concrete tapered end section for speeds 40 mph or less on permanent and temporary. We show on our drawings a 5:1/6:1 type transitions vertically. I can’t find the history on this and thought you might have some history on the tapered end section. I know the RDG indicates 20’ minimum length down to 4” from probably 32”. This is around an 8:1 transition.
I appreciate your help!
System Performance Evaluation
System Types
Permanent Concrete Barriers
Applications
System Features
Date
February 20, 2014
Previous Views (203) Favorites (0)
Attachment
King1.png
Attachment
King2.png
Response
Response
(active)
You are correct that the RDG does allow this on lower speed facilities when space is limited. However, this vertical taper has never been crash tested successfully to my knowledge.
Vertical tapers have been tested at TL-2 for low profile PCB designs at TTI. However, these were at TL-2 speeds and had barrier heights of 20” or less, not the 32” specified here.
The taper guidance in the RDG is likely based on information in NCHRP Report 358. Previous computer simulations of the sloped end treatment, as shown in NCHRP Report 358, found that the sloped end treatment for a 32" high barrier can cause overturn of the vehicle for impact speeds of 30 mph or greater.
We have answered a similar question for MoDOT in the past. See the response below as it details the testing of sloped end treatments and our recommendations.
http://mwrsf-qa.unl.edu/view.php?id=490
Date
March 4, 2014
Previous Views (203) Favorites (0)
Some parts of this site work best with JavaScript enabled.