I reviewed the information you sent.
While typical stirrup design would have hooked ends like those shown in your detail, the as-fabricated stirrup may function appropriately. Based on the function and loading of that stirrup in the bridge rail, the development of the vertical arms of the stirrup is most critical. This can be developed through a simple 90 degree bend. According to code, that would require a length of 12*db or 7.5” in this case. It appears that the as-fabricated stirrup has this length in the bend adjacent to the vertical arms.
The other load directions on the stirrup are less critical here during impact loading, and the additional stirrups that tie into the deck at 12” spacing will help reduce the potential for overloading of the 5c1 stirrup.
As such we don’t see a major issue with using the as-fabricated stirrup as proposed below.
Thanks
Some parts of this site work best with JavaScript enabled.