I was asked how close can a underground obstruction be to a beam guard post. I search your web site and incorporated some of that guidance into the drawing above.
I did not know how close a parallel underground obstruction could be from a post. So I tried to use some of the guidance from the mow strip Research to develop this drawing.
What do you think?
I think your minimum offsets are justifiable. I have a few comments:
TTI conducted full-scale crash testing on guardrail systems with 18”x18” leave-outs. The posts were offset 3” from the front of the leave-out. Thus, there was 9” of leave-out located between the back of the post and the back of the leave-out. You can reduce your minimum “X” and “Y” distance to reflect 3” and 9” gaps in front and behind the posts, respectively.
We have recommended that MGS posts have a minimum of 6” gap between the side of the post and a rigid hazard.. Accordingly, you could reduce the minimum “Z” distances to 6”.
If a hazard is located closer to a post than these limits, you should consider omitting a post. Omitting a single post within an MGS installation has been recently proven crashworthy. Guidelines for often a post can be omitted were included in the project report, TRP-03-326-16.
Some parts of this site work best with JavaScript enabled.