As mentioned in the Year 28 Problem Statements by Wisconsin, we frequently have to use TBR for projects with less than TL-3 speeds. Up until six months ago, we had defaulted to using full eight sections for an unanchored run before we could expect the 48” deflections used in our standards. In answering a unique design question recently, I had to dig into that guidance to see what modifications we could make to fit the project’s needs. Part of my reply was the following:
For 62 mph, previous guidance (page 6 of TRP-03-209-09 and others) has suggested that 8 sections (100') upstream and downstream of the impact point (or protection area) are needed to properly “anchor” a free-standing section so that the deflection relates to the Unanchored column in Table A of BA-401. Using that information, we could presume that for similar deflections, a 50% reduction in speed would allow for at least a 50% reduction in length of need. As it turns out, the attached shows that it’s more like a 66% reduction in length of need (35 mph = 33% of TL-3). The equation and values come from page 11, equation 2-1, in 2009 MASH.
My question to you is, are the presumptions made above consistent with other available information you’ve been able to find since TRP-03-209-09 and TRP-03-113-03 were published or in preparation for the Year 28 Problem Statements packet? The above situation was focused on minimizing TBR length rather than deflection, but perhaps the opposite approach could be used keeping the eight sections upstream/downstream and focus on reduced deflection. See attached for calculations.
Any additional thoughts or comments will help guide our decisions until such time these layouts are actually tested.
Thank you for your time.
I have just finished writing up sections of a report on this subject for NDOR where we looked at reduced PCB lengths an potential deflections for TL-3 and the 85th percentile impact conditions. That report is currently in draft review internally at MwRSF. It should address a lot of your questions.
The work for NDOR does not go down to TL-2 or 1, but does look at speeds around 51 mph.
As we discussed in November at the Pooled Fund meeting, if states want to look at the lower speeds, we can run some simulations under a very small year 28 project to look at the lower speeds.
Some parts of this site work best with JavaScript enabled.